Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12551 (UTT)

M/S KAMA STEEL TUBE INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER UTTARAKHAND STATE GST COMMISSIONERATE DEHRADUN

WPMS/2857/2022 · 2025-03-24

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS IA No. 5 of 2025 In WPMS No. 2857 of 2022 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Tarun Lakhera, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Shubham Bhardwaj,learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for respondent no. 3. 4. Withdrawal application has been filed by the petitioner seeking withdrawal of the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is intended to avail alternative remedy, as provided under Section 107 of CGST/SGST Act. 5. In view of the submission as advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If such a liberty is availed by the petitioner, the concerned authority may decide the same as per law. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 24.03.2025 Parul