Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12550 (UTT)

BALJEET SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1157/2024 · 2025-03-11

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1157 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Ananya Jain, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as final report has been submitted in the matter on 24.02.2025, after investigation, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 11.03.2025 SK