APHC010147312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7918 of 2025 Between: 1. CHEJARLA RAMESH, S/O. MUNASWAMI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. MANAVALI VILLAGE, OJILI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT AT TIRUPATI. 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURUPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. TAHSILDAR OJILI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. SAKAMURI VENAKATA LAKSHMI, W/O. RETMABADRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O. MUMMAYAPALEM VILLAGE, ST COLONY, KUNDAM POST, OJILI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents, particularly the 4th respondent in insisting the petitioner to vacate from the agricultural landed property without consider the petitioner representation dated 03.03.2025 Vide Grievance No TPT202503033398 submitted in PGRS- Collectorate Monaday Tirupati, for Correction in Computerized Adangal and 1 B (ROR) Shows in the 2 name of 5th respondent and also to mutate my name in all online web land revenue records that are being maintained by the 4th respondent for my agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extent of Ac.2.09 Cents covered by Survey No. 178/2 of Manavali Village in ojili Mandal of Tirupati District, without issuing any notice to petitioner and without following any known procedure established by law and declare the same as, illegally, arbitrary. unjust and unconstitutional and violative principles of natural justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment over the aforesaid agricultural landed property and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The petitioner’s counsel addressed a letter dated 30.08.2025 (part of record) to the Registry requesting to list the present case under the caption “For Withdrawal”. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is listed today i.e., on 02.09.2025, under the caption “For Withdrawal”. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Basing on the letter addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is accorded and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.09.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.7918 of 2025 Date: 02.09.2025 siva