Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125478 (ALL)

NAFEESHA BEGAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LK AND ANOTHER

WRIC/1895/2025 · 2025-03-04

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13091-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1895 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nafeesha Begam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lk And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Singh,Abhishek Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner has applied for license for operating a meat shop. In this process a report has been sought, as claimed by the petitioner, from the Superintendent of Police, Bahraich by the Food Safety Department. 3. If any such report has been sought by the aforesaid department let the opposite party no. 2 get the facts verified and do the needful as per law but with expedition, say, within a period of three weeks unless there is any legal impediment in which case he shall inform the petitioner and the department concerned in writing. 4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 4.3.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench