[2025:RJ-JP:29048] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4163/2025 Gudi Bai D/o Baje Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Gram Kadodiya, P.s. Sunel, District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Bhawanimandi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyansha Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.190/2024 registered at Police Station Sunel, District Jhalawar for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2) & 103(1) of BNS. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that deceased is brother-in-law of the petitioner and there is land dispute between the deceased and petitioner’s husband. It is submitted that no evidence is available on record to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. Counsel submits that as per FIR, there are omnibus allegations against the petitioner. It is further contended that co-accused person of this case namely Shivani has already been granted benefit of bail by this court. Petitioner is female and she is in custody since 01.10.2024. Trial of the case [2025:RJ-JP:29048] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4163/2025] will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the material in the form of charge-sheet; petitioner is female & trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Gudi Bai D/o Baje Singh shall be released on bail provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /112