IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6714 of 2025 Decided on: 25th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sarwan Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned Standing Counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. The writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner from his initial date of appointment i.e. w.e.f. 16-05-2005, with all consequential benefits, alongwith upto date interest. ii) That or in alternative, the respondent corporation may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner immediately after one year i.e. in 2006, by 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? 2 modifying regularization order dated 04-04-2013 with all consequential benefits.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the reliefs prayed for by the petitioner are covered by the decision rendered in Vikram Singh Vs. Himachal Road Transport Corporation2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be content if the case of the petitioner is considered by the respondents in light of the aforesaid judgment. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to this prayer. 5. Having regard to above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The decision so arrived at, shall be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 25, 2025 Judge Mukesh 2 CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, decided alongwith connected matters on 09.11.2023.