DARA SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/1646/2025 · 2025-05-05
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125446 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125446 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25881-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1646 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dara Singh And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Vikram Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sukh Deo Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of respondent no.4 is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Sukh Deo Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and perused the record.
3. This petition seeks issuance of a writ for quashing the F.I.R. dated 26.02.2024 bearing Case Crime No.0174 of 2024, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki.
4. In the supplementary affidavit filed today, it is stated that the mater has been compromised except for one of the accused namely Amandeep Rai. In paragraph no.4 of the aforesaid supplementary affidavit, the respondent no.4 has stated that she will not make any claim against the accused namely Amandeep Rai, who is not a party to the compromise dated 03.03.2025 as all the claims have been settled between the petitioner and the complainant.
5. The Senior Registrar of this Bench has submitted its report dated 07.03.2025 along with the settlement entered into between the parties, whereby the parties have settled their dispute amicably.
6. Learned counsel for the parties state that even the amount under the said agreement stands settled between the parties and that there are no further claims or demands against each other with respect to the matter involved in the present writ petition.
7. Considering the terms of settlement, we, accordingly, quash the F.I.R. All proceedings/investigation which may have been
held consequent thereto are also quashed and the writ petition is allowed.
8. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this
order to the Court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly.
9. Learned A.G.A. shall communicate this order to the investigating officer concerned. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.)
Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench