DEVENDRA KUMARI YADAV v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/5721/2025 · 2025-03-01
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125409 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125409 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
106 IN THE HI
Devendra Kumari
State of Haryana
CORAM: HON
Present: Mr.
TRIBHUVAN D
The directing the resp petitioner on her the post of JBT T
2.
Lear petitioner will be raising the grieva may be disposed specified period k to other employ Annexures P-12
3.
Notic
4.
Ms. that in case any su HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5721
Date of De
umari Yadav
Versus ryana and Others
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH Mr. Laxman Choudhary, Advocate fo AN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed inter alia e respondents to fix/protect the pay as er subsequent appointment, i.e., JBT Teacher, and pay the arrears and o
Learned counsel for the petitioner s ill be satisfied in case she is permitte grievance as has been raised in the in sposed of by directing the responde eriod keeping in view the fact that sim mployees vide office orders dated 2 and P-13 respectively. Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryan any such representation is filed by the AND HARYANA 5721-2025 of Decision : 01.03.2025
…Petitioner
….Respondents RIBHUVAN DAHIYA cate for the petitioner. r alia seeking a writ of mandamus pay as ₹58,600 from ₹47,600 of the 06.02.2019 as PGT Hindi from s and other consequential benefits. ioner submits that at this stage, the rmitted to file a fresh representation the instant petition, and the petition pondents to decide the same in a at similar benefit had been extended dated 30.01.2024 and 16.12.2024, Haryana, accepts notice and submits by the petitioner within a period of
us f the from , the ation tition in a nded , mits
PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.03.03 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-5721-2025
two weeks from t no.1-Additional C speaking order in office orders da receiving the repr
5.
In vi has no objection t
6.
Orde
7.
In ca officer concerned
March 01, 2025 ps
2025
-2-
from today, the same will be consider ional Chief Secretary, School Educat rder in accordance with law keeping ers dated 30.01.2024 and 16.12.20 e representation. In view of the statement made, lear ction to the petition being disposed of Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed wit cerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the
2025
Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable
nsidered and decided by respondent ducation Department, by passing a eeping in view the aforementioned .12.2024, within three months of e, learned counsel for the petitioner sed of in terms of thereof. ed within the stipulated period, the 0 to the petitioner.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA)
JUDGE
: Yes/No
: Yes/No
ent ing a oned s of ioner , the YA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.03.03 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document