Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125395 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD DAOOD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LAW AND JUSTICE LKO. AND ANOTHER

A227/1141/2025 · 2025-03-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12943 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1141 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Daood Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Law And Justice Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Israr Ahmad Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature, commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 i.e. the Civil Judge (Hawali), Lucknow to decide the application U/O 39 Rule 142 in case no. 2000/2024, Mohammad Daood, Versus Mohd. Amir, Regular Suit No. 2000/2024 as contained in ANNEXURE NO. 3 to the petition within a stipulated time." 3. Considering the prayer limited to the issue of mandamus, the writ petition is disposed off directing the court concerned to decide the application under order 39 Rule 1 & 2 expeditiously within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench