SMT. PRIYA SHRINET v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
A483/194/2025 · 2025-03-03
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125375 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125375 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12464 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 194 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Priya Shrinet Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Chandan Srivastava,Ichchha Singh,Shubham Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for respondent State. The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking direction to the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate Custom), District Lucknow to expedite and decide the trial pending in Complaint Case No.70458/2022 under Section 498A and 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 within a stipulated period. Perused the record. Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021, has held that undue preference should not be given to the new trials while expediting the proceedings over the old trial. This is a new trial much older trials are pending. Thus, considering the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court M. Gopalakrishnan and others (supra) and the facts of the case, the prayer for expeditious disposal is refused. The application is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench