AFTAB ALAM ALIAS MO MAHATAB AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/168/2025 · 2025-02-27
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125363 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125363 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11821 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 168 of 2025 Applicant :- Aftab Alam Alias Mo Mahatab And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar,Alpana Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Notice to respondent No. 2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order.
3. By this application, the applicant has prayed for expeditious disposal of compliant case No. 950 of 2021, under Section 323, 504, 506 and 147 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Biswa, District Sitapur, pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Biswa, District Sitapur.
4. Perused the record.
5. Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021, has held that undue preference should not be given to the new trials while expediting the proceedings over the old trial. This is a new trial much older trials are pending.
6. Thus considering the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court M. Gopalakrishnan and others (supra) and the facts of the case, the prayer for expeditious disposal is refused.
7. The application is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench