[2025:RJ-JP:14304] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3615/2025 Kamal Singh S/o Shri Revti Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gali No. 5, Subhash Nagar, Ghukhna, Police Station Nandgram, District Gaziyabad (Uttar Pradesh) (At Present Accused Petitioners Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4203/2025 Pradyuman Singh S/o Ramsukhi, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Tigariya, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Singh Mr. N.S. Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 28/03/2025 These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 40/2024 registered at Police Station Special Police Station, SOG District A.T.S. and S.O.G. for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC and Section 66-D of IT Act. [2025:RJ-JP:14304] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3615/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further contended that the petitioner Kamal Singh has been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench in FIR No. 41/2024. It is contended that similarly placed co-accused Hitesh Bhadu and Vimlendu have already been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 03.03.2025. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioner Pradyuman Singh is in custody since 22.02.2025 and Kamal Singh is in custody since 05.08.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the accused- petitioners may be enlarged on bail. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of bail application and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record. It is contended that petitioners in collusion with other co- accused has prepared forged Taekwondo certificates and thereafter provided it to the other co-accused. The petitioners also received huge amount in their bank accounts. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner Kamal Singh was involved in similar nature of case and against him FIR No. 41/2024 is also registered, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the instant bail applications of the accused-petitioners deserves to be dismissed. Heard and perused the material available on the record. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Similarly situated co-accused Hitesh and Vimlendu have already been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated [2025:RJ-JP:14304] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3615/2025] 03.03.2025. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner Kamal Singh has also been enlarged on bail in FIR No. 41/2024 and the offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioners are triable by Magistrate and trial of the case will take considerable time. Charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner Kamal Singh has already been submitted before the concerned court, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners 1. Kamal Singh S/o Shri Revti Singh, 2. Pradyuman Singh S/o Ramsukhi, in connection with FIR No. 40/2024 registered at Police Station SOG District A.T.S. and S.O.G. shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge. The accused- petitioner Kamal Singh is directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Magistrate. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /7-8