Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12252 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1735 of 2025 Applicant :- Machalu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar Singh,Aditya Singh Tomer Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in jail since 10.12.2024 in Case Crime No.578 of 2024, under Sections 80(2), 85, 115(2), 351(2) 352 of B.N.S. & Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Maholi, District Sitapur. It has been submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as he has not committed any offence as alleged. 3. Attention has been drawn towards the impugned F.I.R. wherein the general allegations have been levelled against all family members including the present applicant. The present applicant is brother-in-law of the victim (since deceased). No specific role has been attributed to him. The relation of the present applicant with his sister-in-law (since deceased) was cordial and he has never demanded any dowry from her or her family members. The F.I.R. has been lodged having ulterior motive and extraneous design in the mind of the complainant. The cause of death is hanging. There is no antemortem injury except one ligature mark around the neck area which might be cause due to hanging. The investigation is going on. 4. The learned counsel for the applicant has given an undertaking on behalf of applicant that the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall abide by all terms and conditions of bail, if granted. 5. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. Without entering into the merits of the case and considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties, contents and allegations of the F.I.R., the fact that no specific role has been assigned to the present applicant, only general allegations have been levelled against the applicant, he has never demanded any dowry from the victim (since deceased) or her family members, the cause of death is hanging, there is no antemortem injury except one ligature mark around the neck area which might be caused due to hanging and the undertaking given on behalf of the applicant that he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant Machalu, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C.may be issued and if the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall not leave the country without permission of the Court concerned. Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench