BASANT LAL @ ANTIM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1905/2025 · 2025-03-04
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125293 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12953-DB
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1905 of 2025 Petitioner :- Basant Lal @ Antim Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Pooja Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shyam Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Shri Shyam Singh, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 3. The same is taken on record.
2. Heard Dr. Pooja Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Shyam Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3.
3. The petitioner claims that for the preceding term of the lease for fishery rights in respect of the Pond in question existing on Gata No. 514 which has now been settled in favour of the opposite party no. 4 the petitioner had put some row in the Pond and invested money into it, therefore, he may be permitted to take out the said fish or be compensated for the same.
4. This is purely factual matter and a civil dispute. The petitioner may avail other remedies or approach the authorities concerned raising grievance in the matter which can be looked into, but, this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can not interfere in the matter.
5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench