Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13901-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2009 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neeraj Kumar Respondent :- Authorized Officer Canara Bank Regional Office Ayodhya Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikas Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- Vinay Shankar Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. Learned counsel for the Bank says that sale notice has already been issued which is referable to Section 13(4) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, therefore, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the petitioner wants to pay the amount in installments. This is not a matter to be seen by this Court at this stage. The petitioner may avail other remedies as per law. The Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench