HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No.1028 of 2024 Avdhesh Kumar Tyagi ...Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent Present:- Mr. Sharang Dhulia Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant Avdhesh Kumar Tyagi seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No. 507 of 2023, under Sections 274, 275, 276, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Gangnahar, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, on 29.08.2023, upon information having been received, the police raided a premises and recovered large number of medicines, raw materials and other articles, which are used in manufacturing of medicines. Samples were sent for Government Analyst examination. According to the report of the Government Analyst, the quality of samples was not up to the standard. It is the co-accused, Amit Dhiman, who revealed that he manufactures the medicine for Robin and 2 printed foil papers are provided by the applicant, who is owner of the Aviral Factory. 4. It is submitted that applicant is not named in the FIR. There is not material against the applicant. Charge sheet has already been filed. He has merely been involved in the case based on the statement of the co-accused. 5. These factual aspects are not denied by learned State counsel. 6. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that this is a case fit for anticipatory bail. 7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 8. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions: (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness, in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. 3 (iii) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the court concerned. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case, the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the court concerned. (iv) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i) & (ii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 02.01.2025 Jitendra