SARVESH KASHYAP AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. (HOME) LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/1926/2025 · 2025-03-06
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125188 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1926 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kashyap And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. (Home) Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Srivastava Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioners had taken loan from opposite party no. 3 which is a private financial institution and now seeks a mandamus to the opposite parties no. 1 and 2 not to dispossess the petitioners.
3. The petition is absolutely misconceived and not maintainable. It is dismissed as such without prejudice to the rights, if any, of the petitioner to pursue other remedies as may be prescribed in law. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench