Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125171 (ALL)

SUMITRA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF GRAMYA VIKAS LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/2218/2025 · 2025-02-24

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11554 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2218 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumitra Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Gramya Vikas Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Nath Goswami Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Shiv Nath Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has sought directions to the respondents to appoint/promote him on the promotional post of Anganwadi Karyakarti at Angamwadi Kendra - Narharpur Darbpur, Pariyojana - Bhiti, District - Ambedkar Nagar. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is a post graduate candidate and had worked satisfactorily for five years on the post of Anganwadi Assistant from 27.09.2016. 4. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that she has not been considered for promotion earlier and in this regard the representations given by the petitioner have not been decided and now petitioner's candidature has not been considered on the ground that she has become over age, which, according to the petitioner is against the Government Order dated 06.12.2006. 5. After arguing the matter up to some length, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that grievance of petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 4 - District Programme Officer, Ambedkar Nagar to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 31.01.2025, annexed as Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition, expeditiously. 6. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection in case suitable directions are issued to respondent no. 4 to consider and decide petitioner's representation. 7. In view of above, present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 4 - District Programme Officer, Ambedkar Nagar to consider and decide petitioner's representation dated 31.01.2025, annexed as Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition, expeditiously, say within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law by means of reasoned and speaking order and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench