ANAND KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLRD/91/2025 · 2025-02-27
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125153 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125153 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11968 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 91 of 2025 Revisionist :- Anand Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Haridwar Singh (H.D.Singh ),Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent Nos.2 and 3 are dispensed with. A perusal of the office report shows that revision has been filed with delay of 1927 days. A perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay further shows that delay has not been explained properly in fact there is hardly any explanation of delay. In such circumstances, the inordinate delay of 1927 days cannot be condoned, the delay condonation application is accordingly dismissed. Consequently, the revision is also dismissed. Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench