DR. SRI. MUDUNDI RANGANATHA RAJU AGRI TECH FOUNDATION TRUST v. STATE OF AP
WP/9012/2020 · 2025-09-11
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12514 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12514 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010147622020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9012/2020 Between:
1. DR. SRI. MUDUNDI RANGANATHA RAJU AGRI TECH FOUNDATION TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE, MUDUNDI RAJESH FATHER NAME. MUDUNDI BALARAMA KRISHNAM RAJU, AGE. 32, D. NO. 3-42, PEDDA AMIRAM VILLAGE, KALLA MANDAL OF WEST GODAVARI DISRTICE, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT 5TH BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, ROOM NO. 107, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE OFFICE ELURU - A.P.
3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICE, ELURU - A.P.
4. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYAT OFFICER, NARSAPURAM DIVISION NARSAPURAM - WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,
5. THE MANDAL PARISHATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KALLA MANDAL PARISHAD OFFICE, KALLA, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT A.P - 534237. 6.
THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYATH OFFICE, PEDAMIRAM VILLAGE OF KALLA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT - 534204
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particulary one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 6 in painting the petitioners building Sri Mudundi Rajam Raju Smaraka Bhavanamu complex of Community Hall and Library along with Gram Panchayat Office with the colours associated to the ruling party flag by violating the common order dated 10.03.2020 passed by this Honourable Court in W.P. (PIL) No. 177 of 2019 and W.P. (PIL) No. 18 of 2020 as bad, void, arbitrary, illegal, violtion of National Building Code 2016, Articles 19, 300A of the Constitution of India and against the principles of natural justice consequently direct the Respondents to remove the colours painted on the Petitioners building Sri Mudundi Rajam Raju Smaraka Bhavanamu complex of Community Hall and Library along with Gram Panchayat Office and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to remove the colours associated to the ruling party painted on the Petitioner’s building Sri Mudundi Rajam Raju Smaraka Bhavanamu complex of Community Hall and Library along with Gram Panchayat Office and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VEMUGANTI MAHESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT)
3. I KOTI REDDY The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITON NO.9012 OF 2020 ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. 2.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the matter becomes infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 12.09.2025 BSP
139
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.9012 of 2020
12.09.2025 BSP