ANIL KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/1800/2025 · 2025-02-21
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125121 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11273 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1800 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishna Ram Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 5 and Mr. Mohan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 6.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authorities for final adjudication upon petitioner's complaint dated 05.11.2024 made against the Pradhan in terms of Section 95 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act.
3. Learned State Counsel on the basis of instructions submits that a preliminary inquiry has already been instituted which is on going.
4. In view of such submissions, the opposite party no. 2 i.e. District Magistrate, Sultanpur or any other concerned authority is directed to decide the aforesaid proceedings expeditiously after affording opportunity of hearing to the Pradhan concerned in terms of provision of Section 95 (1) (g) of the Act.
5. In view of aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 21.2.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench