Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12511 (UTT)

SHARAN MANWAL AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1150/2024 · 2025-05-21

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1150 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Divya Jain, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Ms. Sheetal Selwal, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Pratima Shail, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 6. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that final report has been submitted in the matter, on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement made by State counsel, nothing survives in the writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 21.05.2025 SK