SHAILENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. ENERGY LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1792/2025 · 2025-02-28
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 125105 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12303-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1792 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajaiy Kumar Mishra,Kapil Dev Chaubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard Shri Anoop Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Shri Ajaiy Kumar Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner,
learned Counsel for Electricity Corporation and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner wants removal of a transformer which is installed in his Bhumidhari land since quite some time. Learned Counsel appearing for Electricity Corporation says that there are 65 electricity connections from the said transformer and the said transformer is not on his land rather it is on the side of his land.
3. Be that as it may, let the application of the petitioner in this regard be considered as per law. These are factual disputes which can only be seen by the opposite party No.3. Let the petitioner move an application before him, which shall be considered and decided as per law but with expedition say within a period of six weeks.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 28.2.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench