Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125103 (ALL)

RADHESHYAM AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY., REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/1051/2025 · 2025-02-28

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12038 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1051 of 2025 Petitioner :- Radheshyam And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Revenue, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abdul Haleem Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Surendra Kumar Singh Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 to 3 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Surendra Kumar Singh learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no.4-Nagar Palika Parishad. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of the Revision No.C-2015040000255 filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.2. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is ready to furnish an undertaking that the petitioner will not seek any unnecessary adjournment and shall also cooperate in the early disposal of the aforesaid case. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Revision No.C-2015040000255 filed under Section 219 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. The petitioners shall also furnish an undertaking, as mentioned above, along with a copy of this order. In case, if the petitioner does not furnish the aforesaid undertaking, then the petitioner shall not be entitled to the benefit of this order. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Harshita Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench