Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125099 (MAD)

Mahalingam.N v. The Principal Secretary

WA(MD)/727/2025 · 2025-03-28

J Nisha Banu, S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2025 M.Mahalingam ...Appellant -Vs- 1.The Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, Trichy District. 4.The Personal Assistant to the District Collector (Development), Trichy District. 5.The Block Development Officer, Thiruverumbur Panchayat Union, Trichy District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.13013 of 2023 dated 06.11.2024. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2025 For Appellant : Mr.S.Sabari Bala Pandian For R1 to R4 : Mr.S.S.Madhavan Additional Government Pleader JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) This Writ Appeal is filed against the order of this Court, dated 06.11.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.13013 of 2023. 2.The writ petitioner seeking promotion to the post of Junior Assistant after his retirement on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.745, dated 18.07.1980, has filed writ petition. 3.The writ petitioner was appointed as Night Watchman in the year 1981 and he retired from service in the year 2010 as Recorded Clerk. Thereafter, he sent several representations to the authorities concerned seeking promotion to the post of Junior Assistant. The said representations were rejected on the ground that the writ petitioner has not passed in SSLC and none of his juniors were given promotion bye-passing the writ petitioner. The learned Single Judge considering all these aspects had dismissed the writ petition holding that till the date of retirement, the writ petitioner did not come under the zone of consideration and hence, the benefit of notional promotion could not be extended to the writ 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2025 petitioner. We find no reason to interfere with the order passed in the writ petition. 4.Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. (J.N.B.,J.) (S.S.Y.,J.) 28.03.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To 1.The Principal Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai. 3.The District Collector, Trichy District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2025 J. NISHA BANU,J. and S.SRIMATHY.J ta W.A.(MD)No.727 of 2025 28.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis