Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125082 (ALL)

RADHEY SHYAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/1787/2025 · 2025-03-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12942 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1787 of 2025 Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Sachidanand Mishra, learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties no.2 to 4 to conduct the enquiry against the opposite party no.6 who has illegally closed the chakmarg (public way) situated on the land Gata No. 203 area 0.3640 Hectare situated at Village-Sarsawan, Pargana-Sarsawan, Tehsil-Sarojini Nagar, District-Lucknow and get open the said chakmarg (public way) which is the convenient egress and ingress of the petitioner and other villages, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties no.2 to 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 18.2.2025 contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition by a speaking and reasoned order within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and till disposal of the representation, the opposite party no.6 may be restrained from raising the construction over the land Gata No. 203 area 0.3640 Hectare situated at Village-Sarsawan, Pargana-Sarsawan, Tehsil-Sarojini Nagar, District- Lucknow, in the interest of justice." 3. The learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions states that suitable entries have been made in Khatauni, whereby land in question was transferred for constructions of colony. 4. In view of the said instructions, the relief as prayed for cannot be granted. The writ petition is dismissed. 5. The petitioner would be at liberty to take such steps as may be advised under law, if so advise. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench