Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125028 (ALL)

SHOBHNATH BIND @ SHOMNATH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/649/2025 · 2025-02-27

Karunesh Singh Pawar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 649 of 2025 Appellant :- Shobhnath Bind @ Shomnath And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Rakesh Kumar Nayak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for appellants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present petition has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 140 of 2021, (Brijlal Vs. Malhuram & others) relating to Police Station Fatanpur, District Pratapgarh as well summoning order dated 08.11.2024. Learned counsel for petitioners, after arguing for some time, submits that present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the appellants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). Order Date :- 27.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench