Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 125019 (ALL)

SHIV NARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/1828/2025 · 2025-03-03

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12440-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1828 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Narayan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. If any order dated 03.07.2024 has been passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate Sandila under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and it has attained finality then it is his obligation to implement the said order. If the Revenue Inspector has disturbed the demarcation thereafter and Sub Divisional Magistrate Sandila has been informed about the same then he should have got the facts verified and should have done the needful. Let the petitioner's grievance be looked into by the opposite party No.3 and if he finds that the Revenue Inspector concerned has acted illegally and the demarcation, which has attained finality has been disturbed without any authority of law or order of any Court, then he shall do the needful otherwise he shall communicate the reasons to the petitioner as to why no action is required at his end. Let this exercise be completed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order and the private parties may also be heard in the matter. 3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 3.3.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench