I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE D^USTICE WRIT PETITION NO: 758^^F KMANMADHA RAOV-^ Between: Mr. Korlam Venkata Vidya Sagar, S/o. Sri Korlam Rama Rao, aged about 33 years, Occ Inspector of Income Tax, presently R/o Income Tax Quarters Road No. 12, NBT Nagar, Banjara Hills. Hyderabad 500034. Wo H.No.49-41-5/10 King's Residency S4, N.G.Os. Colony Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District - 530 016'^ ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Home Secretary Buildings, Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur DistrictN"^ 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam 3. The Station Housejtfficer, Akkaiahp^m, Visakhapatnam 4. Smt. Tumbali Sai Jyoshna, W/o Sri K.V. Vidya Sagar , Permanent R/o 6-107, Ravindra Nagar, Near Reliance Visakhapatnam-530 040. 5. Sri Tumbali Siddeswar^ao, S/o Tumbali Keswara Rao, Age 55 years ernnanent R/o.6-107, Ravindra Nagar, Near Reliance Tower Visakhapatnam - 530 040. Secretariat Age 26 years. Tower, 6. Smt. Tumabli Gowri Parvathi, W/o Sri Tumbali Siddeswara Rao Age 50 years^Permanem R/o.6-107, Ravindra Nagar, Near Reliance Tolr Visakhapatnam - 530 040. ' ’ ...Respondents^ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the produce my mother Smt. Uma Bharath may more particularly one in the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to i W/o K. Rama Rao by freeing her from the illegal custody, detention and high handed action by the 4th respondent and her family members (including the petitioner's parents house respondent Nos.5 and 6), in bearing No.49-41-5/10, King's Residency Akkayyapalem, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District immediately in the interest of justice S4 N.G.Os. Colony, 530 016 1-/ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 The Court made the following order: KURITI BHASKARA RAO to 3: THE ADVOCATE G^ERAL 1 APHC010147682025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 7582/2025 Between: Korlam Venkata Vidya Sagar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KURITI BHASKARARAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner has approached this Court with the complaint that his wife, father-in-law and mother-in-law together had kidnapped and forcibly detained his mother. The petitioner further contends that the police has not taken any steps for the release of his mother despite his giving necessary complaints. 2 It appears that this complaint is being raised in the background of his marriage to his wife, who is respondent No.4, on 17.02.2024 and subsequently breakdown of the marriage due to which he filed O.P.No.320 of 2025 before the I Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam seeking dissolution 2. of marriage. When the matter was called, the mother of the detenue who is identified by Sri G.L. Nageswara Rao, a learned counsel of this Court is personally present in the Court and states that she has not been detained by any person and is presently living in her own house in Visakhapatnam along with her daughter-in-law, who is respondent No.4 herein. 3. Sri G.L. Nageswara Rao has also placed a complaint dated 04.02.2025, given by the mother of the petitioner, in Rayadurgam police station which has now been registered as Crime No. 102 of 2025. The complaint of the mother of the petitioner was that the petitioner was missing and needed to be traced out. 4. In the circumstances, it is clear that there is no merit in this Writ 5. Petition and the said Writ Petition appears to have been filed as an abuse of the process of the Court. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed with costs of Rs. 10,000/- payable by the petitioner to the State Legal Services Authority within a period of four weeks. In the event of such payment not being made, the s§me would be recovered from the petitioner. 6. ,\ -f 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. MEMO OF COSTS WP No.7582 OF 2025 ii Cost Quantified By Court (That the writ petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand), The amount shall be deposited to Andhra Pradesh State Legal Services Authority within a period of four (4) weeks. Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR e^fe^FICER //TRUE COPY// SE To, 1. The Home Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, State of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Visaktiapatnam 3. The Station House Officer, Akkaiahp^^m, Visakhapatnam Secr^ry, Andhra Pradesh Legal Service Authority, High Court of 4. The A.P. at Amaravati. 5. One CC to Sri. Kuriti Bhaskara Rao Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to The Advocate General, High Court oj^^dhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC i HIGH COURT DATED:24/03/2025 ORDER WP.No.7582 of 2025 0lAPR20?'i Current Section fa: DISMISSING OF THE WP WITH COSTS