Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12497 (GAU)

REKHA KALITA AND ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/1567/2025 · 2025-05-25

Nelson Sailo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010104162025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1567/2025 REKHA KALITA AND ORS ASSISTANT TEACHER, ANCHALIK H.S. SCHOOL, MERKUCHI W/O DHARANIDHAR KALITA VILL- GELPEJAR, P.O. MERKUCHI DISTRICT- BAKSA, ASSAM, PIN-781346 2: BABITA NATH ASSISTANT TEACHER ANCHALI H.S. SCHOOL MERKUCHI W/O RAJIB BRAHMA VILL- DONGPAR P.O. JALAHGHAT DIST. BAKSA ASSAM PIN-781327 3: PUTULI DAS ASSISTANT TEACHER NAMATI MOUZA HIGH SCHOOL W/O RABIN JIT MEDHI VILL AND P.. NIZ NAMATI DIST. BAKSA ASSAM PIN-78135 VERSUS Page No.# 2/4 THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION BODOLAND TERRITORIAL AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR PIN-788819 DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 3:THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS BAKSA DISTRICT CIRCLE MUSHALPUR DIST. BAKSA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S Ali, MR K DAS,MD S HUSSAIN,MRS. P B HAZARIKA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SEC. EDU., SC, BTC B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER 26.05.2025 Heard Mr. S Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner who submits that by filing this application, the petitioner seeks the correction of certain clerical mistakes appearing in the Order dated 21.03.2025. The learned counsel submits that in the said order, Smt. Rekha Kalita has been shown as “D/o Dharanidhar Page No.# 3/4 Kalita”. In fact, it should be “W/o Dharanidhar Kalita”. Secondly, the name of the School has been wrongly shown as “Anchalik H.S School, Merkuchi” in respect of the petitioner No. 2. He submits that instead of “Merkuchi” it should be “Anchali H.S School, Anchali”. Thirdly, the learned counsel submits that name of petitioner No. 3 has been wrongly shown as “Putali Das”. The correct name is “Putuli Das”. Mr. P Hazarika, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. S R Rabha, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 & 3 submits that he has no objection if the correction to the typographical mistakes is made. In view of above, the correction as sought for the application is hereby allowed. In other words, Rekha Kalita will be shown as “W/o Dharanidhar Kalita” and the School in which the respondent No. 2 is working will be read as “Anchali H.S School, Anchali” and the name of petitioner No. 3 will be read as “Putuli Das”. I.A stands disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Page No.# 4/4 Comparing Assistant