Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2818 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sahab Singh Respondent :- Debt Recovery Tribunal Allahabad And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Kesharwani,Girja Shanker Mishra,Pratiksha Rai Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to correct the prayer clause of the writ petition during course of the day. No notice be issued to the private respondents taking into consideration the nature of the order proposed to be passed. The petitioner before this Court is seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1 to decide Securitization Application NO. 698 of 2024 (Sahab Singh and another Vs. Authorized Officer IIFL) as well as also decide urgency application, within stipulated period of time. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that since the matter is pending consideration, the petitioner is suffering irreparable loss. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the concerned court below to consider and decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law expeditiously but certainly after giving opportunity to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. It is made clear that no unnecessary adjournments shall be granted to either of the parties and in case any adjournment is sought on behalf of the parties, same shall be granted after imposing cost of Rs. 500/- per adjournment upon the party concerned with direction to deposit the same by the next date fixed. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad