Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124937 (ALL)

SITARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/2399/2025 · 2025-03-21

Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16455-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2399 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sitaram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadava,Abhaya Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 3. On 17.03.2025 we had passed the following order:- "1. Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadava has sent adjournment slip on the ground of illness, however, it is informed that in this petition, the petitioner is seeking compliance of temporary injunction granted on 18.08.2023 by the civil court in suit No.2123 of 2023 which is pending consideration before Civil Judge (J.D.), Raebareli, however, the application under Order 39 Rule 2A of C.P.C. filed by the petitioner in the said suit has already been rejected on 23.01.2025, therefore, Mr. Mohan Singh, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.7 says that the petition itself is an abuse of process of law. 2. List on 21.03.2025 as fresh. 3. No further adjournment shall be granted at the behest of the petitioner. 4. Mr. Mohan Singh, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.7 and Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Standing Counsel for the State shall communicate our order to learned Counsel for the petitioner." 4. If the petitioner has any further grievance the remedy would be before the trial Court or the Appellate Court, as the case may be, but, a writ petition in this regard would not be maintainable. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 21.3.2025/R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench