MEENA YADAV AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO AND 2 OTHERS
CRLA/634/2025 · 2025-02-28
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124913 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124913 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 634 of 2025 Appellant :- Meena Yadav And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Syed Mohd. Munis Jafari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for appellants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present appeal has been filed to set aside the Chargesheet No-1 dated 13-10-2024, Cognizance as well as Summoning
order dated 13-12-2024 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST) Act, District Court- Ambedkar Nagar in Crime No. 342 of 2024, U/S- 115(2), 351(2), 352, 131,333 BNS & 3(1) (r), 3(1) (s), 3(2) (Va) SC/ST Act, Police Station-Jalalpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, allowing the appeal (contained in annexure No.2 & 3).
Learned counsel for appellants, after arguing for some time, submits that present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the appellants appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).
Order Date :- 28.2.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench