IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.6777 of 2025 Date of Decision:25.04.2025 _______________________________________________________ Ravinder Singh …….Petitioner Versus Director Technical Education & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Since, it is not in dispute that petitioner herein, who is working as Instructor Fitter at Government ITI Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, has already completed his normal tenure of posting at present place of posting, this Court sees no reason to interfere in the impugned transfer order dated 10.04.2025(Annexure P-2), which has been laid challenge in the instant proceedings. However, having taken note of adverse family circumstances, as came to be apprised by learned counsel for the petitioner during proceedings of the case, this Court without going into the merits of the 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file representation to the competent authority within a period of one week, praying therein for cancellation of transfer order or his adjustment at convenient station on account of adverse family circumstances, which in turn, shall be decided by the competent authority within a period of two weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass detailed speaking order thereupon, taking note of the transfer policy. Till the time, representation, if any, filed by the petitioner within a period of one week is not decided by the competent authority, petitioner shall not be compelled to join at the transferred station in terms of impugned transfer order. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge April 25, 2025 (shankar)