SUNDAR LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/2257/2025 · 2025-02-28
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124906 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124906 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12072 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2257 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sundar Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parashu Ram Kanaujia,Abhay Mani,Ajeet Kumar,Annapurna Agnihotri,Rajeev Kumar,Savita Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 and 2 and Dr Uday Veer Singh,
learned counsel for the respondents no. 3 and 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed contending that despite the petitioner having retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2014 from the post of Headmaster the entire amount of GPF as due to him has still not been paid to him. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.4 i.e. Finance an Accounts Officer, Basic Education Council, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.4 then respondent no.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 28.2.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench