Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12487 (UTT)

SUMAN AGARWAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

SPA/836/2018 · 2025-07-02

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS SPA No. 836 of 2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the appellant. 2. Mr. Sushil Vashishtha, Standing Counsel with Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Devesh Kandpal, Advocate for respondent no. 5. 4. This intra-court appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 08.06.2018 passed in WPSB No. 1777 of 2008. By the said order, learned Single Judge has directed for registering an FIR against the appellant. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the FIR was registered in terms of impugned order, and the appellant was thereafter superannuated and all issues are now settled, therefore, the special appeal has become infructuous. 6. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, the special appeal is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 02.07.2025 Navin