MST ZAITONA AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (PUBLIC) AND ORS
WP(C)/2340/2025 · 2025-09-24
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12486 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12486 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 123 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 2340/2025 CM(6196/2025) Mst Zaitona And Others. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Saqib Amina Parray, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
ORDER 24.09.2025
01. There are some factual deficiencies in terms of averments made in the writ petition which may not enable a proper adjudication of this writ petition, as such, the learned counsel for the petitioner when pointed out very humbly seeks withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh one.
02. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted, provided a certified copy of this writ petition is annexed with the fresh writ petition to be
filed so as to serve as a basis to differentiate as to whether the next writ petition has come up with the requisite factual averments or not.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 24.09.2025
“HAMID”