- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2354-DB MFA No. 201557 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 201557 OF 2021 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. RAJA BHAKSHA S/O YAMNUR AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. ADAVIBHAVI, ASHAR POST, TQ. LINGASUGUR, DIST. RAICHUR – 584122. 2. MOUNESH YANANOORSAB KATKAR AGE: 30 YEARS, OCCU: OWNER, R/O. ADAVIBHAVI, ASHAR POST, TQ. LINGASUGUR, DIST. RAICHUR – 584122. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI SANDEEP VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. PARVATHI W/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, 2. ANITHA W/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGE: 07 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, 3. VARADANAYAK S/O LATE HANUMAPPA AGE: 03 YEARS, OCC: NILL, 4. BALAPPA S/O THIMMAPPA AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: NILL, Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2354-DB MFA No. 201557 of 2021 5. MANAVVA W/O BALAPPA AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, ALL ARE R/O. KACHAPU VILLAGE, TQ. LINGASUGUR, DIST. RAICHUR, NOW AT R/O. LBS NAGAR, RAICHUR – 584122. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BASAVARAJ R. MATH, ADV. FOR R1, R4 & R5; R2 & R3 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY R1) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 25.06.2021 IN MVC NO.242/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND MACT, RAICHUR, THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) The learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal with the prayer to refund the statutory amount in deposit. 2. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the matter is settled in the execution proceedings and - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2354-DB MFA No. 201557 of 2021 in view of the same, he seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the appeal and prays for refund of the statutory amount in deposit. 3. In view of the said submission and the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. The Registry is directed to refund the statutory amount in deposit to the appellants. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31 CT: PS