Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124844 (ALL)

HAROON v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

A482/1624/2025 · 2025-02-20

Sanjay Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11062 Court No. - 18 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1624 of 2025 Applicant :- Haroon Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Mansoor,Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The instant application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to permit him to submit two sureties and personal bond in all 15 cases in which he was roped and applicant has been granted bail in all cases by the competent courts. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in 15 cases. He next submitted that in all the cases registered against the applicant, he has been granted bail by the competent courts. He says that the applicant is a very poor person and not in a position to furnish huge sureties in each and every case in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that the details of cases registered against applicant at District-Pratapgarh are as follows:- (i) Case crime no. 251/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Aspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh. (ii) Case crime no. 250/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Aspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh. (iii) Case crime no. 252/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Aspur Devsara, District Pratapgarh. (iv) Case crime no. 270/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (v) Case crime no. 251/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (vi) Case crime no. 264/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (vii) Case crime no. 395/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (viii) Case crime no. 377/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (ix) Case crime no. 233/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (x) Case crime no. 232/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (xi) Case crime no. 269/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (xii) Case crime no. 338/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (xiii) Case crime no. 376/2023, U/s 380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (xiv) Case crime no. 268/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. (xv) Case crime no. 337/2023, U/s 457,380, I.P.C., police station Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 20,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 20.2.2025/saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench