Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10965 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2126 of 2025 Petitioner :- Fateh Mohammad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Narayan Shukla,Krishna Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Taha Arif, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 and 3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has not been granted benefit of the ACP although the persons similarly circumstanced have already been granted the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Sri Taha Arif, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel appearing for the respondents no.2 and have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 20.2.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench