Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12481 (HP)

TIKKAM RAM v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/928/2025 · 2025-05-05

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tikkam Ram vs. State of H.P. Cr.MP(M) No. 928 of 2025 05.05.2025 Present: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate, for the applicant/ appellant. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G. with Mr. I. N. Mehta, Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Mr. Sushant Kaprate, Addl. A.Gs. and Mr. J. S. Guleria, Dy. A.G., for the respondent. Notice. Mr. Navlesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of one (1) day that has crept up in filing of the appeal. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of. Cr. A. No. _________ of 2025 Be registered. Admit. Call for the record. Cr. M.P. No. ______ of 2025 Be registered. Notice. Mr. Navlesh Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Reply be filed within three weeks List on 02.06.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 5th May, 2025 (sanjeev)