Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12480 (RAJ)

RAVINDRA KUMAR SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAM KHILARI SHARMA v. ICICI BANK LIMITED

CW/5406/2021 · 2025-03-03

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:9148] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5406/2021 Ravindra Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Ram Khilari Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of F-159, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Icici Bank Limited, Chief Executive Officer, Icici Bank Tower, South Tower, West Wing Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai (Maharashtra) Through Regional Office, Icici Bank Limited C-3 Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, (Raj.) 2. Manger Retrial Group, Icici Bank Limited (Retiral Group), Rajasthan Bank Bhawan, C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Chief Manager, Hrmg, Icici Bank Limited, Rajasthan Bank Bhawan, C-3, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6104/2019 Ravindra Kumar Sharma, Son Of Shri, Ram Khilari Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, Resident Of F-159, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Icici Bank Limited, Chief Executive Officer, Icici Bank Tower, South Tower, West Wing, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai (Maharashtra) Through Regional Office, Icici Bank Limited, C-3 Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, (Raj.) 2. Manager Retrial Group, Icici Bank Limited (Retiral Group), Rajasthan Bank Bhawan, C-3 Sardar Patel Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, (Raj.) 3. Chief Manager, Hrmg, Icici Bank Limited, Rajasthan Bank Bhawan, C-3 Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sangeeta Kumari Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Namish Nigotia [2025:RJ-JP:9148] (2 of 2) [CW-5406/2021] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 03/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the trial court has decided the main suit. Hence, these civil writ petition have been rendered infructuous. The civil writ petitions are accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Tahir/154-155