OHDAR ODEYA ALIAS ODAR OREYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3874/2025 · 2025-06-11
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12480 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12480 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:15091] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3874 of 2025
------ Ohdar Odeya @ Odar Oreya, S/o Late Dilka Odeya, aged about 31 years, R/o Village- Barkela, PO & P.S.- Murhu, District- Khunti, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Poddar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-11-06-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Murhu P.S. Case No.19 of 2022 corresponding to NDPS Case No.10 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 18, 25 of the NDPS Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cultivation of poppy. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused persons who have already been admitted to bail. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the place of occurrence land and the place of occurrence land does not belong to him. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.01.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 01.05.2025 passed in B.A. No.3327 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Khunti in connection with Murhu P.S. Case No.19 of 2022 corresponding to NDPS Case No.10 of 2022 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/