APHC010146752020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8948/2020 Between: 1. SATYA SAI MAHILA MANDAL, SATYA SAI SEVA MAHILA MANDAL, DNO.2-35/1, MUDAPURAM VILLAGE, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. MULLAPUDI SAVITRI, W/O NAGESWERA RAO, AGE. 57, ADDRESS. PRESIDENT, SATYA SAI SEVA MAHILA MANDAL, DNO. 2-35/1, MUDDAPURAM VILLAGE, TANUKU MANDAL, WEWST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MUDDAPURAM VILLAGE, TANUKU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TANUKU MANDALAM, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, TANUKU MANDALAM, TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in making efforts to establish Rythu Bharosa Kendram in the Satya Sai Mahila Building situate in Dno.2-35/1 of Muddapuram Village, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents herein to continue to run Satya Sai Seva Mahila Mandal in building bearing Dno.2-35/1 of Muddapuram Village, Tanuku Mandal, West Godavari District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KANUKOLANU SRI SAI SANJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI (SC FOR ZPP MPP AND GRAM PAN) 2. I KOTI REDDY 3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 8948 of 2020 This Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 09.09.2025 Krk HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 381 WRIT PETITION No.8948 of 2020 09.09.2025 krk