RAM PAL v. UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION, GHAROTA
CRM(M)/1278/2025 · 2025-12-12
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12478 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12478 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 1278/2025 CrlM No. 2375/2025
Ram Pal
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
vs
UT of J&K .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 12.12.2025
1. On the previous date of hearing, request for adjournment was made on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Today, in the first half, when the matter was taken up, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, as such, the matter was passed over. Same was the position when the matter was taken up in second half. This clearly demonstrates lack of interest on part of the petitioner to prosecute the instant petition.
3. Accordingly, the instant petition along with the connected application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 12.12.2025 Sahil Padha
Serial No. 1 Sahil Padha 2025.12.15 14:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document