Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12471 (JHR)

THAPKA DAS ALIAS JAYANTO MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3762/2025 · 2025-05-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:13655 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3762 of 2025 ------ Thapka Das @ Jayanto Mandal, aged about 24 years, s/o Govind Das @ Govind Mandal, r/o Village-Kurthipara (Khadanpara), Pakur, P.O.-Pakur, P.S.-Pakur (T), Dist.-Pakur, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 06.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.329 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 118(1)/ 119(2)/ 109(1)/ 352/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and his mother. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.02.2025, as has been submitted by the learned Senior Advocate in the Court. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Pakur, in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.329 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant, victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/