IN TH 101 Ajmer Sin Vidhya Sa another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU proceeding order dated of this Cou vs. State of on the basi effect that petitioners weeks…..” 11 and 12 COCP-2201-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.2201 o Date of decision er Singh and another Versus Sagari, R.U. IFS, Divisional Fo AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Ms. Seema Kumari, Advocate Mrs. Sonia G. Singh Samber, A for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Shri Pankaj Kumar, Sr. Assista HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitio eedings be initiated against the respond r dated 31.5.2022 (Annexure P-7) pass is Court in CWP-13584-2019 titled as tate of Punjab and others”, whereby t e basis of statement made by learned t that “….in case the actual benefits a ners, the same will also be released ..”. Learned counsel for the respon nd 12 of the reply dated 21.7.2025 fi 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 2201 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-07.11.2025 …..Petitioners al Forest Officer, Patiala and …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate for mber, Advocate i, AAG Punjab assisted by Assistant, DFO, Patiala. petitioners submits that contempt espondents for not complying the ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench tled as “Ajmer Singh and another reby the petition was disposed of arned counsel for the State to the fits are yet to be released to the sed within a period of next four respondent-State refers to para 9, 025 filed by way of affidavit of VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.07 18.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Guramanpr Forest Off Annexures the necessa 11 and 12 o COCP-2201-2025 (O & M) manpreet Singh, PFS, holding additi st Officer, Patiala on behalf of resp exures R-4 and R-5 annexed with the ecessary compliance has been made b d 12 of the said reply reads as follows “xxx xxx xxx 9. That the conten petition are admitted petitioners have been PPO order no. 1122030 PPO order no. 1122030 the date of start of pens is 01.11.2015 and the d the petitioner no. 2 01.01.2017, it is infac para is wrong and henc xxx xxx xxx 11. That the conten petition talk about the n of pension of the petitio petitioner no. 2. How mention here that the and the gratuity of the credited to their respect 02.05.2023 and 13.01 the present petition infr 12. That the conten petition are a matter o mention here that the a receiving the contemp 09.12.2024 wrote a lett Officer, Patiala vide 2 additional charge of Divisional of respondent No.1; as well as th the said reply and submits that ade by the respondents. Paras 9, ollows :- ntents of para no. 9 of the itted to the extent that the een granted the pension vide 2030688 dated 24.05.2022 and 2030687 dated 26.05.2022 and pension for the petitioner no. 1 the date of start of pension for 2 is wrongly mentioned as infact 01.02.2017. Rest of the hence denied. ntents of para no. 11 of the the non payment of the arrears titioners and the gratuity of the However, it is pertinent to the arrears of the petitioners f the petitioner no. 2 has been spective bank accounts on dated 3.01.2025 respectively making infructuous in nature. ntents of para no. 12 of the ter of record. It is relevant to the answering respondent after tempt cum legal notice dated letter to the District Treasury de letter no. 13680 dated VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.07 18.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document since the c present pet Writ Court the present COCP-2201-2025 (O & M) 26.12.2024 and informe requested them to do possible. Copy of the le Annexure R-1. Thereaf present Writ Petition i after receiving the intim answering respondent District Treasury Offic 1919 dated 22.05.2025 was also send vide 05.06.2025. Copy of bo herewith as Annexure Treasury Officer, Pati dated 23.06.2025 rever respondent with the 18.06.2025 along wi petitioner no. 2 which amount of arrears and account of the peti 02.05.2023. Copy of t along with account stat annexed herewith as intimation regarding pe from his banker on da herewith as Annexure R Learned counsel for the resp the compliance has been made; thus nt petition. Learned counsel for the petitio Court order dated 31.5.2022 (Annexu resent contempt petition and the same 3 ormed them about the same and do the needful as early as he letter is annexed herewith as reafter, the petitioner filed the ion in this Hon'ble Court and intimation about the same, the ent again wrote a letter to the Officer, Patiala vide letter no. 025 and reminder of the same vide letter no. 2795 dated of both the letters are annexed ure R-2 & R-3. The District Patiala vide letter no. 6287 everted back to the answering the letter of the bank dated with account statement of ich shows that all the pending and gratuity was credited to the petitioner no. 2 on dated of the letter from his banker statement of petitioner no. 2 is as Annexure R-5. Similarly, g petitioner no. 1 was received n dated 23.06.2025 is annexed re R-4.” e respondents-State submits that ; thus, no cause survives in the petitioners submits that since the nnexure P-7), nothing survives in same may be disposed of. VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.07 18.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document made by l petition is November Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-2201-2025 (O & M) In view of the above noted by learned counsel for the petition ion is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ember 07, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 4 noted facts and the submissions etitioners, the present contempt if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.07 18.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document