Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124685 (PNJ)

SUKHPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

RSA/6302/2017 · 2025-02-15

Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-6302-2017 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sukhpal Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : None for the appellant. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. LAPITA BANERJI In the present Regular Second has challenged the judgment and order passed by the Additional District Judge, Chandigarh on March 27, 2017 whereby the judgment and order dated May 12, 2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh has been up 2. The issue raised in the present Regular Second Appeal is identical to the issue raised in RSA No.3122 3. The appeal is terms of the judgment and order of even date passed by this Court in RS No.3122-2016. 4. Accordingly RSA 6302 February 15, 202 Vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 2017 (O&M) Sr. No.215 2nd case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : Sukhpal Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI None for the appellant. Mr. Brijesh, AAG, Punjab. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) In the present Regular Second Appeal, the plaintiff has challenged the judgment and order passed by the Additional District Judge, Chandigarh on March 27, 2017 whereby the judgment and order dated May 12, 2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Chandigarh has been upheld. The issue raised in the present Regular Second Appeal is identical to the issue raised in RSA No.3122-2016. The appeal is decided in favour of the plaintiff terms of the judgment and order of even date passed by this Court in RS 2016. Accordingly RSA 6302-2017 is allowed. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No case IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-6302-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 15.02.2025 …Appellant …Respondents HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Appeal, the plaintiff-employee has challenged the judgment and order passed by the Additional District Judge, Chandigarh on March 27, 2017 whereby the judgment and order dated May 12, 2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), The issue raised in the present Regular Second Appeal is 2016. in favour of the plaintiff-appellant in terms of the judgment and order of even date passed by this Court in RSA allowed. (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.03.04 09:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document