Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12466 (AP)

MARAMREDDY RAMA NARAYANA REDDY v. SASI BUSAN KUMAR IAS

CC/1899/2024 · 2025-07-09

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010146962024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1899/2024 Between: 1. MARAMREDDY RAMA NARAYANA REDDY, S/O. PERA REDDY, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O. 6-72, YARRAPALLE, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, 2. MARAMREDDY VEERA MOHAN REDDY, S/O. RAMA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. 6-72, YARRAPALLE, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, 3. MARAMREDDY RAMANAMMA,, W/O. RAMA NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. 6-72, YARRAPALLE, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, 4. MARAMREDDY MAMATHA, , W/O. VEERA MOHANA REDDY, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O. 6-72, YARRAPALLE, KOMAROLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SASI BUSAN KUMAR IAS, S/O. AYODHYA PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. AJAY JAIN IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (LA) DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 3. A S DINESH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 4. M JHANSI RANI, W/D/O. NOT KNOWN, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR (LA), PS VELIGONDA PROJECT PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 5. D SIVA JYOTHI, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA), R AND R UNIT, CUMBUM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.... 6. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF AP FOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIATE AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT 7. SRI S JOHNSON, THE COLLECTOR LA PS VELIGONDA PROJECT PRAKASAM DISTRICT ONGOLE 8. M VENKATA SHIVA RAMI REDDY, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LA R AND R UNIT CUMBUM PRAKASAM DISTRICT RR 6 TO 8 ARE AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 03 04 2025 VIDE I A NO 2 OF 2025 IN CC NO 1899 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to leased to punish the respondents in terms of Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilfully disobeying/violating the orders of this Honourable Court passed in W.P.NO. 30565 OF 2023, dated 28-11-2023 passed by Honourable Sri Justice RAVI CHEEMALAPATl in the interest of Justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the certified copy of the Judgment in WP No.30565 of 2023 and proceed with the contempt case in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No 2 in CC No. 1899/2024 in WP No.30565 of 2023 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to discharge the Respondent No.4 in CC No. 1899/2024 in WP No.30565/2023 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to impleaded the Proposed Respondents No. 6 to 8 as Respondents No. 6 to 8 in CC No. 1899 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. C VAMSI KRISHNA 3. S SIVA KUMARI 4. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 28.11.2023 passed in W.P.No.30565 of 2023. Sri U.Lovaraju, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri Devarapu Rambabu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt has been complied and there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the contempt. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 10th July, 2025 RKS