Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12465 (HP)

BABU RAM v. ONKAR CHAND SHARMA AND OTHERS

COPC/468/2025 · 2025-07-04

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.468 of 2025 Date of Decision: 04.07.2025 __________________________________________________________ Babu Ram …….Petitioner Versus Onkar Chand and Others ….Respondents __________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Bir Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Reply filed on behalf of respondents, if perused in its entirety, it clearly reveals that entire amount, save and except gratuity on account of retiral benefits, stands released to the petitioner. As per respondents, case of the petitioner for release of gratuity has been sent to the office of Accountant General and as and when sanction is received, gratuity shall be released. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged. Respondents are directed to ensure that amount of gratuity, payable to the petitioner, is paid expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived, so 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken against the erring officials. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 04, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)